Get Free Ebook The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom

By starting to read this book immediately, you can conveniently find the right way making far better high qualities. Use your free time to read this publication; also by pages you can take much more lessons as well as ideas. It will certainly not restrict you in some events. It will certainly release you to always be with this publication every single time you will certainly review it. The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom is now readily available right here and be the initial to obtain it now.

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom

Get Free Ebook The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom

The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom. Join with us to be member below. This is the site that will certainly give you reduce of browsing book The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom to review. This is not as the other website; the books will certainly be in the types of soft data. What advantages of you to be participant of this site? Get hundred collections of book connect to download and install and also obtain constantly upgraded book everyday. As one of guides we will present to you currently is the The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom that includes an extremely pleased principle.

Feeling tired after doing some activities in vacations will order you to have relaxation for some moments. It will certainly also aid you to fulfill the fee time. When you could enjoy your time for leisure and overlook the scenic view around you, it is the most effective time to have likewise reviewing. Yeah, reading publication becomes a really ideal concept to do now. Yet, do are you really feel unusual not to bring certain publication?

This The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom is recommended for you from every phase of the life. When checking out comes to be a must, you could consider that it can be part of your life. When you have actually thought about that reading will be better for your life, you could believe that it is not only a must yet likewise a pastime. Having hobby for reading is good. This way could help you to always enhance your abilities and knowledge.

Regarding this book, you could not need to be worried to get it as reading material. This book shows how you can begin to like analysis. This book will certainly show you how modernity will certainly complete the life. It will likewise verify that enjoyable publication will be additionally factual book that depend on just how the writer tells as well as utter the definition to the viewers. Based on this situation, now you have to select The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates, By Howard Bloom as one of your collections to check out. One more time, that's for your analysis product.

Review

"If Howard Bloom is only 10 percent right, we’ll have to drastically revise our notions of the universe. . . . [His] argument will rock your world." -BARBARA EHRENREICH, National Magazine Award winner and author of Nickel and Dimed "Enthralling. Astonishing. Written with the panache of the Great Blondin turning somersaults on the rope above Niagara. Profound, extraordinarily eclectic, and crazy. The most exciting cliff-hanger of a book I can remember reading." -JAMES BURKE, Creator and host of seven BBC-TV series, including Connections"Bloody hell. . . . What a truly extraordinary book. I’m gobsmacked. It’s a fast-paced, highly readable, and deeply researched thriller-documentary that grapples with the big issues of the universe. . . . Food for the brain." -FRANCIS PRYOR, President of the Council for British Archaeology, author of Britain BC "For those of us who do not invoke god(s) to explain things, there is a challenge—where did the complexity of the physical and natural world come from? . . . This deep, provocative, spectacularly well-written book provides some answers. . . . A wonderful book." -ROBERT SAPOLSKY, MacArthur Foundation "genius grant" winner and author of Why Zebras Don’t Get Ulcers"Strong. Like a STEAM ROLLER. Impressive. Great." -RICHARD FOREMAN, MacArthur Foundation "genius grant" winner and founder of the Ontological-Hysteric Theater "A deeply engrossing and mind-bending meld of philosophy and science, written with great clarity, humor, and daring." -CHARLES SIEBERT, Contributing writer, New York Times Sunday Magazine"Truly awesome. . . . Bursting with insights and ideas, delivered with delightful verve and zest. . . . A tantalizing, fresh new view of the cosmos for humankind."-DUDLEY HERSCHBACH, Winner of the 1986 Nobel Prize in Chemistry

Read more

From the Author

There's a secret hidden in a mathematical nugget called Peano's Axioms.  Is Peano 's mystery the key to the cosmos?The God Problem tackles the question of how a godless cosmos creates; of how a universe without a bearded and bathrobed god in the sky pulls off acts of genesis. And it pursues the riddles behind five mildly flabbergasting heresies: a does not equal a one plus one does not equal two entropy is wrong randomness is not as random as you think andinformation theory is way off base.Says The God Problem: God's war crimes, Aristotle's sneaky tricks, Galileo's creationism, Newton's intelligent design,  entropy's errors,  Einstein's pajamas, John Conway's game of loneliness, Information Theory's blind spot, Stephen Wolfram's New Kind Of Science, and six monkeys at six typewriters getting it wrong. What do these have to do with the birth of a universe and with your need for meaning?  Everything, as you're about to see.In The God Problem you'll take a scientific expedition into the secret heart of a cosmos you've never seen.  An electrifyingly inventive cosmos. An obsessive-compulsive cosmos. A driven, ambitious cosmos. A cosmos of colossal shocks.  A cosmos of screaming, stunning surprise.  A cosmos that's the biggest invention engine--the biggest breakthrough maker, the biggest creator--of all time.One critic has suggested that The God Problem may be a great book on a par with Darwin's Origin of the Species and Newton's Principia Mathematica.  One Nobel Prize winner and two Macarthur Genius Award winners have said The God Problem is "spectacular" and "great."   Early readers like Amazon.com's number one non-fiction reviewer have said The God Problem is "the next paradigm," "a game-changer," and a book that will "change your life."  And Heinz Insu Fenkl of SUNY's Interstitial Studies Institute says, "The God Problem is the next paradigm. It doesn't take you down the proverbial 'rabbit hole' -- it will take you to a place from which you will never re-emerge, a brand new universe in the same skin as the one you now unknowingly inhabit."Will The God Problem utterly change the way you see everything around you and everything inside you? That's my intention.  But only one person can answer that question: you."Enthralling.  Astonishing.  Written with the panache of  the Great Blondin turning somersaults on the rope above Niagara.  Profound, extraordinarily eclectic, and crazy.  The most exciting cliffhanger of a book I can remember reading." James Burke, creator and host of seven BBC TV series, including Connections"I have just come out from the giddy ride through things of the mind and mathematics that is The God Problem. Bloom takes us on a magic carpet ride of ideas about: well, about everything. And it turns out that everything we knew about everything is probably wrong. The God Problem is an intellectual cave of wonders made more wonderful by the tales of the lives of the people behind the ideas. Don't start this book late at night, for it will banish sleep."  Robin Fox, Rutgers University, author of  The Tribal Imagination: Civilization and the Savage Mind, former director of research for the H. F. Guggenheim Foundation"If Howard Bloom is only 10 percent right, we'll have to drastically revise our notions of the universe. There's no mysticism in The God Problem-- no God, no religion, no incommunicable spiritual insights -- just the contagious joy of a great mind set loose on the biggest intellectual puzzles humans have ever faced. Whether you're a scientist or a hyper-curious layperson, Bloom's argument will rock your world."  Barbara Ehrenreich, author of Nickel and Dimed, National Magazine Award Winner"Bloody hell... What a truly extraordinary book. I'm gob-smacked." Francis Pryor, President of the Council for British Archaeology, author, Britain BC."Is The God Problem a great book like Darwin's The Origin Of Species, Lyell's Principles Of Geology, or Newton's Principia Mathematica?"  Dan Schneider, the man Roger Ebert calls the "ideal critic.""Terrific." Dudley Herschbach, Harvard U, 1986 Nobel Prize in Chemistry."Deep, provocative, spectacularly well written...great." Robert Sapolsky, Stanford U,  MacArthur Genius Award winner."Strong...like a STEAM ROLLER...impressive...great." Richard Foreman, founder Ontological-Hysteric Theater, MacArthur Genius Award-Winner."Mind-bending." Charles Siebert, contributing writer, New York Times Sunday Magazine"Ebullient, enthralling." Alex Wright,  Director of User Experience and Product Research, New York Times, author, Glut: Mastering Information Through the Ages."Utterly extraordinary." Matt Thorne, winner of the Encore Award, longlisted for the Booker Prize. "Thrilling." Hector Zenil, Institut d'Histoire et de Philosophie des Sciences et des Technique."The ultimate scientific detective story." Mark Lamonica, winner of the Southern California Booksellers Association Nonfiction Award."A 'page-turner.'" Walter Collier Putnam,  30-year Associated Press veteran. "Great literature."  Edgar Mitchell, sixth astronaut on the moon."Incandescent...shakes out like shining from shook foil and oozes to a greatness," George Gilder, author, Wealth and Poverty, winner of the White House Award for Entrepreneurial Excellence."Profound and extraordinary." Yuri Ozhigov, Chair of Quantum Informatics, Moscow State University."Entertaining, suspenseful, rigorous, and thoroughly mathematical." Martin Bojowald, loop quantum cosmologist, Penn State Physics Department, author of Once Before Time: A Whole Story of the Universe."Absolutely sparkling with ideas."  David Christian, founder, International Big History Association.."An enjoyment shot through with things you never knew." Allen Johnson, Ex-chair, dpt of anthropology, UCLA."Infectious." Mark Lupisella, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center."The central illuminations glow." Robert B. Cialdini, Arizona State University,  Author of Influence, the most cited social psychologist in the world today."Exalted! Glorious! Astounding."  Nancy Weber, author of 22 books including The Life Swap."An entire paradigm shift!"  David Tamm, author, Tsiolkovsky's Imperative."A paradigm/mind-set/game changer." Robert Steele, #1 Amazon.com reviewer for non-fiction."The next paradigm.  It will take you to a place from which you will never re-emerge, a brand new universe in the same skin as the one you now unknowingly inhabit."  Heinz Insu Fenkl, director, The Interstitial Studies Institute, SUNY."The God Problem will change your life." David Swindle, Associate Editor, PJ Media."What James Joyce's Ulysses might have been like had he written about science.  Don't let anyone undersell this." Steve Hovland, video maker."Genius." Jean Paul Baquiast Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris.Are Giusseppe Peano's 165 words, his five mathematical gems, the key to the universe?  Read The God Problem: How A Godless Cosmos Creates and judge for yourself.

Read more

See all Editorial Reviews

Product details

Hardcover: 708 pages

Publisher: Prometheus Books; 1st edition (August 24, 2012)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 161614551X

ISBN-13: 978-1616145514

Product Dimensions:

6.3 x 1.8 x 9.3 inches

Shipping Weight: 2.4 pounds (View shipping rates and policies)

Average Customer Review:

3.2 out of 5 stars

115 customer reviews

Amazon Best Sellers Rank:

#237,752 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)

As an atheist, this looked like it was going to be a great book --- it's very well written and looked like there would be some great material. However, I got into trouble with it pretty quickly and didn't even bother going past the first chapter. Here's the problem - Bloom starts by suggesting that we need to get rid of some preconceived notions such as 1 mightn't always be equal to 1 and more generally A may not be equal to A. He starts with an example of whether you (A) are the same as a clone of you, which he also refers to as A.I have to call bull on this. He's welcome to call you A and a clone of you A1 and then have a discussion as to whether A and A1 are the same but you have to define what you mean by equality before you can start playing games with definitions such as A = ARather surprising to me given that the author starts by talking about building the entire number system using Peano's axioms.I'm reminded of the old "paradox" question, "if an unstoppable force meets an immovable object, what happens?" The thing is, as soon as you accept the concept of an unstoppable force then you don't get to introduce the concept of an immovable object!So it just makes me agree more strongly with Stephen Hawking's comment that the art of philosophy is dead!

An ambitious work like this, unless it is a masterpiece, requires an immense amount of additional writing to address all of the difficulties.I confess I'm puzzled at the intensity of praise for The God Problem. Several initial pages and the back of the dustcover are filled with endorsements, and the back cover flap describes the author in such hyperbolic terms as would make most of us blush, were anything close applied to ourselves. Perhaps some of the prospective blurbistas demurred. And despite all of the contributions thus, I only spotted one hard-science person, a 1986 Nobelist in Chemistry, and no mathematicians.A friend called me to recommend the work, which at the time he'd not quite finished, but with which he was clearly impressed. Having tried, on his previous recommendation of another Bloom book, The Genius of the Beast, to get through that tome, I was somewhat skeptical. But when he went on to tell me how he'd never known about Peano, which he pronounced like Beano, I thought: what in the wide world of sports does an axiom system for the natural numbers, introduced around the turn of the 20th century when the logical foundations of mathematics were all the rage, have to do with the nonexistence of God? So I ordered the book.The Peano postulates are introduced in the context of a class Bloom was in at Reed College. He makes the material sound as if it is well-nigh impenetrable, and cites the high SAT scores (what?) of the class members to support his claim that they were very special. After a bit more reading I realized that the author is high on axiomatics, and rules for generating “complexity” out of minimal beginnings, and then thought: Ah! I bet as well I'll find Wolfram and his obsession with cellular automata featured prominently. And indeed I did. But I did not find a convincing connection as to how much of this pertains to the cosmos of physical space-time, let alone one populated by conscious and self-conscious beings.Backing up a bit, as others have noticed: this is not a book by a "professional" atheist like Dawkins. Bloom, after all, is originally a successful promoter and salesman (see Genius of the Beast for some historical details), and had to find a fairly sensational title to assure getting his "oxygen" of attention. And he touches on some of the standard arguments against God, the "cause of the first cause" one that appealed to Russell, and the Problem of Evil one that perplexes many. Without revealing exactly my own evolving views, we're not talking about some guy “bearded and bathrobed”, as Howard terms Him toward the book's end. So this is not a polemical work like Hitchens' God is Not Great. It is rather a rambling attempt at system-building and something by way of a confessional, indeed for me rather embarrassingly revealing of the extent to which its author is still feeling the acute influence of who he was as a child and adolescent, "growing up awkward" in Buffalo.Others have remarked on the gimmick of insisting that we become Boy Howard for a day, and this leading to sentence structures and momentary misapprehensions that quickly become very tedious. But perhaps others find them charming and evocative.As mentioned, the sheer length of the book, even if it were considerably condensed by cutting out a lot of florid verbiage, makes it impossible to do a succinct enumeration of all of the issues. But the epistemological material in the early part of the book is mostly a succession of what professional philosophers call "logical howlers". They are presumed to shock us and leave us in awe, I suppose. There are also astonishing distortions of rather-well-established physics, like thermodynamics, which within its appropriately-circumscribed domain works just fine. Here and there, swipes are taken at Ayn Rand, but referencing only her novel Atlas Shrugged. What would have served the author better: her Introduction to Objectivist Epistemology, a partial account of her theory of concepts, and particularly the parts about concepts of consciousness and axiomatic concepts.And then there’s Shannon and Weaver and information theory. No sooner has he stated explicitly that they said that their term "information" did not have the same meaning as the conventional and colloquial, that it did not encompass meaning, than we are off and running about Shannon's "mistake". Now I do agree with Bloom here that the term has been colossally misused.At times the prose reaches such heights of obscurity as to beggar description, reminding me of the statement by Randy California of the 60s rock group Spirit, that "Everything is Everything". Here is a sample, I hope reproducible as part of the fair use doctrine:"So information is not necessarily two-way communication. Information can go one way. What turns it into information? Translation. Interpretation. In other words, the key to making something neutral into information is Shannon's missing ingredient: meaning. And what is meaning? Movement. The movement of a quark, the movement of a mote of space dust, the movement of a tongue, the movement of a pen, the movement of a hand on a keyboard, or the movement of Robert Darwin's block of stone with fossilized plesiosaur bones to the Royal Society (65).Which leaves a question. Is anything really neutral? Is everything meaning waiting to be invented? Waiting to be understood?But there are more corollaries to the idea that information is anything that a translator can decode. There are more truly peculiar implications to the simple idea that information is any signal that can be turned into a response." (pp. 431-432)I find this not only baffling, but almost motivationally suspicious. Look at the number of concepts deployed here, and ask yourself why, with this suggestion of identifications among them, do we need distinct words for each of them.When we get to fractals and the Mandelbrot set, a simple example of its iterative generation would have been helpful, instead of --- after this apology: "I hate to go incomprehensible on you", he pulls out references to Babylon and building city walls from earlier in the book. Contrast this with something that addresses the math in clear terms, a short section in The Princeton Companion to Mathematics (see page 244), a wonderful book which has, as well, a nice observation at the outset about Russell's definition of math and its near-absence of application to what mathematicians do nowadays. And while you are at it, see if you can find any mention whatever in its 1034 pages of Wolfram and cellular automata, a pursuit which has, I suspect, tragically isolated a brilliant mind.And I can't avoid mention of the Conway-Kochen-Dyson-Kaufmann material, that elementary particles' apparent indeterminism means that in some sense they have free will. Really? I hasten to add that all of those folks are furiously bright, but I feel they have been seduced into serious lapses here. However, I'll have to dig out the original references to see in detail what they said.After looking at this curious work from many angles, it struck me that one word rarely seen was Love. So I went into the index, and there it was: love, pp. 515-518. How could I not have recalled it? Well, it bypasses any attempt to describe love other than in terms of war, conflict, "dominance hierarchies", pecking orders --- and begins with, wait for it, protons! I won't spoil it for you.So, as a summary assessment of the book: stylistically maddening, thought-provoking, a couple of good ideas, but a book with the hidden agenda --- an agenda hidden even from the author, probably --- that the purported godless cosmos, following simple rules, had to produce a Howard Bloom who simply has to be the way he is.

Everyone enjoys a good, well explained theory. This book contains no theory, and the explanations are comedically bad. The mark of a great teacher is the ability to explain complicated concepts so simply that anyone can understand. Bloom just quotes Wikipedia.Bloom appears to be under the impression that comparing quarks to Harry Potter bridges some gap in understanding. It doesn't. Instead he winds up with a volume that should have been 1/5th the size, where seemingly half the sentences end in question marks and which appears intended to stroke the ego of a four year old rather than the intellect of an adult. Who cares whether Bloom has a point or not? Wading through this monstrosity wouldn't be worth the effort if he did.And by the way, he doesn't have a point. None. After 558 pages there is a 5 page "conclusion" which just restates questions. The subtitle of the book "How a Godless Universe Creates" is answered with a 5 page version of 'we don't know.'I doubt anyone reading this review will get a visceral sense of just how bad this book is without a quote, so here goes:"And what does that mean for us human beings? It is our obligation to defeat this annihilation by squeezing all that we are, all that we value, through the annihilation at the bagel's edge, through the anally tiny hole at the next universe's center, and into the universe to come. It is our task to come through the next annihilation rejoicing. Intact and giddy with the power of our feat."Yes, that really is the punctuation Bloom uses. No, putting the line into context doesn't help.If you are looking for a good book then keep looking. This should never have been published, and showing it to children should be considered per se child abuse and a crime against their basic human rights.

I'm ashamed at having been lulled into purchasing this book. His sentences are frequently fragmented and flow horribly; he is wholly and entirely unqualified to be answering or even deeply considering "The God Problem,"; and he is narcissistic in thinking that his being a self-proclaimed ardent atheist, as well as an amateur philosopher, somehow places him at the forefront of knowledge.I always finish books, but this assortment of drivel-coated pages made me break that conviction.

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom PDF
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom EPub
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom Doc
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom iBooks
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom rtf
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom Mobipocket
The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom Kindle

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom PDF

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom PDF

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom PDF

The God Problem: How a Godless Cosmos Creates, by Howard Bloom PDF